#Ndepend serial key full#
#Ndepend serial key software#
#Ndepend serial key code#

ndproj extension in the root of the solution where it will store configuration information. By default, NDepend will create its own project file with a. This project only has a simple web front end, a data access tier which also performs the business logic and a test project for the same. YouвЂ™ll then see a list of assemblies generated by the project and available for analysis. YouвЂ™ll see a new вЂњNDependвЂќ menu item with the first option allowing you to attach a new NDepend project to the current solution. NET about many, many years ago so itвЂ™s unsurprisingly messy but thatвЂ™s all the better for illustrating the sort of bad practices we can identify with the tool.ДЇirst up, the Visual Studio integration makes getting up and running pretty simple. ItвЂ™s been my вЂњplaygroundвЂќ since my first foray into. Getting startedДЇor the purposes of this post, IвЂ™m going to run NDepend over a pet project of mine.

#Ndepend serial key full#

ThereвЂ™s a free trial available on the website with a subset of the professional edition or the full blown tool is available for around US$400.

#Ndepend serial key code#

It provides a series of code metrics (76 of them at present) which are analysed and reported on by the tool. NDepend is a Visual Studio plugin which performs a range of analyses across a solution, either during design time or retrospectively across an existing project. This was actually pretty timely as it had been on my вЂњto doвЂќ list for a little while as a potential means of getting more insight into code quality. About NDependДЄ little while back I got an email from Patrick Smacchia of asking if IвЂ™d like to try out NDepend. In short, we need agreed measurable quality objectives that can be quickly and easily gained from projects. If quality is to pervade across projects, or indeed across an organisation, we need to be able to easily repeat the measures so that we can repeat the outcome. We need quality measures.ДЇinally, the whole process needs to be repeatable. Once you can actually agree on the practices which define quality you need a form of measurement in order to indicate the degree of compliance which has been achieved. ItвЂ™s not that many of them are wrong itвЂ™s simply that there are different schools of thought in terms of whatвЂ™s practical. Ask a room full of skilled developers what level of code covered by automated test cases is acceptable and I assure you there will be more than one answer. The first problem you have with quality is that itвЂ™s subjective. The air-quotes around quality are intentional as it is a terribly elusive attribute which is very difficult to consistently attain at a high standard.

#Ndepend serial key software#

A constant challenge I have is in ensuring that вЂњqualityвЂќ is pervasive throughout the execution of software development. I spend a lot of time with a pretty broad range of people in various places around the world delivering software.

Is it any wonder, given the often casual career path of the software developer, that we now see such huge variances in software quality? What exactly is вЂњqualityвЂќ? I find it interesting that industries like construction or real estate require practitioners to be formally certified to the same base level as their peers (at least this is the case in Australia), but software development remains a very informal pursuit.

Sure, there are degrees and certifications but often times there is a large gap between formal academia and practical knowledge. No doubt part of the problem is that there are really no entry criteria to becoming a programmer. ThereвЂ™s just something a little bit different about writing code for a career. You could argue that this is quite possibly due to these being professions which hold peoplesвЂ™ very lives in their hands but you could just as easily extend the analogy to numerous other professional pursuits law, teaching, even professional athletes. Of course there are exceptions вЂ“ every now and then a doctor malpractices or a pilot crashes вЂ“ but these are relatively rare occurrences compared to how often poor quality code is written. Consider industries such as medicine or aviation the lower bounds of their professionalism is comparatively high and the deviation of expertise within the practitioners is comparatively low when compared to software development. Something that has always struck me as a bit unique about the software industry is the huge variances we see in professionalism.